Hear Here
Well-known member
Thanks Peter.
Frankly, I wasn't sure what to expect with GAIA vs spikes in your situation due to concrete (I assume) floor construction vs mine which is squeaky wood where GAIA would most likely be an improvement.
I'll be playing with toe this week. When I heard the 13A at the dealer the sweet spot was much larger so I want to figure out what adjustments allow for this. I may need to go do some measurements to aid in discovery.
Also, I have absolute minimum absorption at the moment, only on the front wall first reflection. I'll be adding back the panels I had on the side and back walls as needed.
edit: When moving the speakers more than a few millimeters, I simply tilt the speaker over and put two glossy type junk mail adverts under each foot and the speaker will now glide across the floor like it's on teflon. My spikes are on floor protector discs.
I'll be most interested on your comments about spikes vs Gaias. My floors are indeed solid timber on screed on concrete, so pretty solid. To protect the floor, I don't like to use spikes, even with protector shoes. I prefer to place my slate slabs on insulation sheets under the spiked speakers - with the spikes on steel or aluminium shoes. The Gaias are OK direct onto the floor. I'm not convinced either way whether I prefer the MLs on spikes or on Gaias.
OK, some good news. After a re-assessment of the kit I have at home, I decided on further adding to the "advantages" I'm offering the MLs compared with the AGs. I've taken out the NAD M12 as preamp and substituted the Micromega M100 integrated, working as preamp only and feeding the Sanders. This amp has a built-in Room Correction facility which sends a frequency sweep through each speaker to be picked up at 3 positions by a calibrated mic - therefore adjusting for combined amp, speaker and room deficiencies. This is an unusual system in that no PC is used apart from initial loading of the mic's calibration stats into the M100 via USB stick. Therefore unfortunately there's no before and after graph to show how measurements have been changed. Also, quite contrary to the ARC system for bass calibration in the MLs. the Micromega system asks for the mic to be pointed directly forward and not towards the ceiling above the mic.
With the room correction engaged, there's a sudden big closing of the gap in the sounds between the 2 pairs of speakers. The MLs have become much fuller and with more richness of sound without being too warm and very much closer to the AG sound. Now music is much more inclined to put a smile on your face - the first time this has happened. So I'm party delighted and partly disappointed! I'm pleased that the MLs are sounding so much more enjoyable to listen to, but disappointed that so much needs to be done to get this out of them - in particular the apparent need for full-range room correction.
Which do I now prefer? Difficult - the MLs have truly excellent bass and possibly slightly more sparkling treble, but overall, if I'm listening to Norah Jones' first (and far and away best) album from Tidal's MQA collection, I shut my eyes and can really believe that the singer is sitting on my hi-fi rack and singing just to me in her sultry voice - when playing through the AGs. There's still that extra "tingle factor" that I'm hoping can be squeezed from the MLs in due course.
The other good news is that the UK distributor is visiting on Thursday to switch the electronics board that has occasionally been reluctant to boot up and I'm sure he'll have more ideas. We'll get there in the end, although if he suggests mega-buck cables or new preamp and whatever else he wants to sell me, he'll probably be disappointed! Anyway I'm looking forward to his visit. Peter
Postscript - The Bristol Show was as disappointing as I was expecting. Lots of mid-fi equipment with speakers featuring 6" bass units (sometimes several) straining to produce "proper" bass. The best sound in show as far as I was concerned was from Focal Supra 3's (demonstrating Naim kit with rather unexciting music) and the 1960s-style Harbeth's M40.2. This looks remarkably like a BBC-designed monitor from decades past, but still an exceptional sound effortlessly delivered - as music should be.
Last edited: