Gordon Gray
Well-known member
HOWEVER even though jitter is actually a real thing, being able to actually hear would seem extraordinarily unlikely.
That's a pretty bold statement IMHO.
HOWEVER even though jitter is actually a real thing, being able to actually hear would seem extraordinarily unlikely.
which eliminates noise from the music signal.
That's a pretty bold statement IMHO.
Anyway, thanks to streamers I'm able to pick up CD's for next to nothing and I love that!!
Every time I read a statement such as the one in bold I can't help but think back to the time I changed the cable between my CDT and DAC and was sitting and listening to music when my non-audiophile wife went by my music room and stopped because something caught her attention. She asked me what I had changed as the system sounded better. She had no idea I had made a change.You are right. People will hear what they want to hear. A USB cable has ZERO, nada, no impact on the data. The music is just data being sent across it, but people will hear what they want to hear.
Every time I read a statement such as the one in bold I can't help but think back to the time I changed the cable between my CDT and DAC and was sitting and listening to music when my non-audiophile wife went by my music room and stopped because something caught her attention. She asked me what I had changed as the system sounded better. She had no idea I had made a change.
An SPDIF cable will make a difference though because that is clocked data going along that cable. Music if you will. And likely in a time before buffered DACs, right?
Very different to how USB cables operate.
I have no problem believing you that a USB cable may make absolutely no difference, but at least I am prepared to sit down and listen for myself rather than just being dismissive based upon the technology.This brings up another issue. People experience something once that leaves an impression and even though the technology has advanced to eliminate an issue, the prejudice is there forever more.
I have no problem believing you that a USB cable may make absolutely no difference, but at least I am prepared to sit down and listen for myself rather than just being dismissive based upon the technology.
I am skeptical, but when someone like Roberto (whose opinion I respect) says he hears a difference, I am prepared to listen, with an open mind.
Ah! But I have no current beliefs. I aim to see if I can hear a difference.Fair enough. Will you have someone swapping cables so that your evaluation is blind? The main issue is that everyone carries their preconceptions with them and unfortunately if you know what you are testing your mind will try to fit what it hears to your current beliefs..
You are right. People will hear what they want to hear. A USB cable has ZERO, nada, no impact on the data. The music is just data being sent across it, but people will hear what they want to hear.
If we couldn't depend on the data being transferred properly by WiFi, USB, etc.. I couldn't even make a living doing what I do.
The real irony is that an audio data stream isn't even very taxing. The fact is that the audio industry has a large number of companies taking advantage of people because they don't understand the technology. Once you question if something is a weak link, in your mind it IS a weak link. If something looks and feels more expensive it doesn't take much of a leap for your mind to fabricate a new reality.
The effect of cognitive dissonance is INCREDIBLY strong. Your mind will tend to rationalize and defend a belief. Two people can read the same article and if you agree with it you will remember it. If you don't agree with it you will tend to forget it. This is how people hold on to misconceptions despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Let's say that someone asks you for help and you help them. In your mind that person is now a better person. Why? To be worthy of your help of course. Your mind is always trying to find ways to make itself right and justify previous decisions, because admitting you are wrong or made a mistake does not compute.
I would very strongly recommend the following book if you want to understand this better.
"Mistakes Were Made (but not by me)" Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson
http://www.amazon.com/Mistakes-Were...1-1&keywords=mistakes+were+made+but+not+by+me
Ah! But I have no current beliefs. I aim to see if I can hear a difference.
You have stepped into something that has been discussed here at great length - whether double blind testing has any merit. I don't listen to music frantically trying to listen for differences when cables are swapped. Instead, I believe in listening for a while, doing a swap, then listening again.
Do your psychological statements take into account the stress that you are under when evaluating cables under DBT conditions? Personally, I don't care for it.
The effect of cognitive dissonance is INCREDIBLY strong. Your mind will tend to rationalize and defend a belief. Two people can read the same article and if you agree with it you will remember it. If you don't agree with it you will tend to forget it. This is how people hold on to misconceptions despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Let's say that someone asks you for help and you help them. In your mind that person is now a better person. Why? To be worthy of your help of course. Your mind is always trying to find ways to make itself right and justify previous decisions, because admitting you are wrong or made a mistake does not compute.
Sorry RC,
This has been debated so many times in so many forums. You clearly fall into the "objective" camp. That's fine but please refrain from preaching to all of us poor folks that believe hearing (and not measurements, dbt tests, and other data) is the basis for making a determination as to whether something is or is not audible.
Nuff said. Let's try to not start a "food fight".
GG
PS: One Ethan Winer is enough.
Enter your email address to join: