David Matz
Well-known member
DSOTM will have instruments etc. in the surround channels - to me this is GIMMICKY. When I listen to live music, I do not sit in the middle of the band, I sit in the audience. For me properly done MCH music uses the surrounds for ambiance, hall, venue sound additions. This is why I like Classical SACD's the best - but they too can get very aggressive with the surround channels.
So it is really a matter of experience and personal preferences for MCH. But when done correctly it can be amazing. Update: And I also feel (based on my experiences) surround speakers should be full range and not these little things you see used by most.
But while sitting there, the influence of the hall/venue does have an affect on how and what you are hearing. This is where MCH SACD when done properly (my opinion on "properly") will give you more of the "you are there" than 2ch will.
To me (my opinion again) this does not equate to good MCH sound. When the album is done properly and the surround channel setup is done properly, you do not even realize the surround channels are playing. But change from MCH to 2CH on your player and you will see/hear the differences and what you are missing - everything just collapses forward and inward.
Dan, what you say captures it perfectly! Bernard, once you experience an excellent multi-channel recording, please re-read Dan's post as it is right on the money. This is not about sound engineers playing around to trip you out, but capturing as much of the performance as possible.
When I heard Peter McGrath (audio recording engineer and Wilson marketing VP) a few months ago, he played the stuff he recorded on all 4 channels and then just the 2 rear channels. There is a LOT of musical information there.