asindc
Well-known member
There is another aspect of this debate that needs consideration. Some of you make your comparisons with what I will call "hot stampers" or vinyl copies that are the cream of the crop. There is a HUGE variation in manufacturing quality in vinyl, with the earliest copies from a given stamper, from an early mother off a near virgin master being the best, and later copies degrading, sometimes considerably. It's like a game of roulette, sometimes you win big, sometimes you win small and sometimes you loose...with everything in between.
Buying a black pizza often resembles what Forrest Gump said...like a box of chocolates...you never know what you're gonna get. Some of you may enjoy that challenge and the "thrill of the hunt" for the best disc possible, however, many of us just want to enjoy the music.
The advantage goes to CDs in the consistency that is achievable in the manufacturing arena, and, for most of us it is huge. Given equal quality mastering, you stand a much better chance getting a good copy of a CD than a good black pizza.
If someone here on the ML forum (member A) gets really excited about a given recording (from a hot stamper) , and the rest of us run out an buy it, the chances are that only a few (if any) of us will have the same auditory experience as member A.
I don't revive this thread to kick the hornet's nest, but hopefully to generate more discussion on the bolded statement below. It happens to reflect my opinion about what I see as the major issue with investing in an analog rig. I am beginning to educate myself what it takes to add an analog setup to my existing digital setup, so I am interested in more opinions on this point. I have heard some really great analog setups (thanks Dave aka twitch), but I think the bolded statement above is very true and gives me pause about going down this road. My main interest in analog is to access music that is not available on any digital format and is not likely to become available as such any time in the future.