Gordon Gray
Well-known member
Average Joe and other things
Hi Shark,
I appreciate your input on my post but I would suggest that FF is not an "average Joe". Any hi end retailer should be able to determine if someone is merely kicking the tires versus a client who is seriously considering buying a product.
How many Average Joes do you know that own Meridian / Clayton electronics, and Revel speakers?
I agree that some sort of financial security is appropriate to secure an in-home audition and did not preclude this possibility when I made my statement. To clarify, I consider this standard protocol. I apologize for not making this clear in my first post.
For the dealer to not suggest this as a way to allow for an in-home suggests an elitist attitude. I assume that this was not done and if it was, I assume that FF would have gladly understood and agreed to this arrangement.
I've purchased all of my current hardware, absent the Summits, on this basis. After having owned the CLS's, the Aerius, and the SL3's, I didn't need the assurance of an in-home audition.
I certainly understand your position given the environment created by the Internet. I would suggest that each dealer needs to make the decision (to loan or not loan for an in home audition) on a case by case basis based on trust, knowledge of the potential buyer, and other appropriate factors.
Best regards,
Gordon
PS: Regarding your post about the 40 hour break in period, within the context of "serious audiophiles" and based on having four different ML models over the past 25 years, I totally disagree with your opinion.
Hi Shark,
I appreciate your input on my post but I would suggest that FF is not an "average Joe". Any hi end retailer should be able to determine if someone is merely kicking the tires versus a client who is seriously considering buying a product.
How many Average Joes do you know that own Meridian / Clayton electronics, and Revel speakers?
I agree that some sort of financial security is appropriate to secure an in-home audition and did not preclude this possibility when I made my statement. To clarify, I consider this standard protocol. I apologize for not making this clear in my first post.
For the dealer to not suggest this as a way to allow for an in-home suggests an elitist attitude. I assume that this was not done and if it was, I assume that FF would have gladly understood and agreed to this arrangement.
I've purchased all of my current hardware, absent the Summits, on this basis. After having owned the CLS's, the Aerius, and the SL3's, I didn't need the assurance of an in-home audition.
I certainly understand your position given the environment created by the Internet. I would suggest that each dealer needs to make the decision (to loan or not loan for an in home audition) on a case by case basis based on trust, knowledge of the potential buyer, and other appropriate factors.
Best regards,
Gordon
PS: Regarding your post about the 40 hour break in period, within the context of "serious audiophiles" and based on having four different ML models over the past 25 years, I totally disagree with your opinion.
Last edited: