Hey, Alan. Technically speaking, the lesser floor/ceiling interaction is due to the fact that the ML's are line sources. Dipole radiation mitigates only side wall interaction, as you've said. Linkwitz, in fact, recommends aiming the side of his dipole speaker right at the 1st reflection point, thus virtually eliminating the (typically) highest-gain reflections.A stat panels 'Figure 8' dipole dispersion indeed limits side wall and ceiling/floor reflections. However there will always be low frequency room interactions from the woofer(s).
A stat panels 'Figure 8' dipole dispersion indeed limits side wall and ceiling/floor reflections. However there will always be low frequency room interactions from the woofer(s).
and the extra bracing of the panel will surely make for a purer sound.
Ha. Ha. Love it! :ROFL:
And let's not forget that the Sanders Sound Model 10 has a panel only seven inches narrower and it includes an external programmable crossover and an acclaimed Magtech amp for the bass, for a price less than the Summit X! Talk about value for your money.
Some pics from Leo, who covers these shows like no other (just set your Browser to translate the Japanese) are mid-way down this page of Neolith pics from Leo
Peter Soderburg was there, nearly said I was Rich for kicks
Interesting. You think those panels behind the speakers are absorptive? That would be my guess, seeing as they have them along the side walls as well.
Just interested to know did you manage to get a seating while listening?
I remember one Summit demo which I commented being bit heavy on bass and my two friends disagreed mentioning lack of bass, the difference was one seating row.
Enter your email address to join: