User211
Well-known member
That's pretty cool, Scott, well done, though I have a bit of an embarassed smile on my face concerning the "are they deaf?" quote of my original post appearing on the Stereophile board... don't worry about it, though!
They obviously all need to get together for a beer and make friends...
Also, however much ML may like to disagree, there will always be an issue with mating dynamic drivers with ESLs. And ML know it - which is why the CLS and CLX exist.
No matter how much they try to reduce the disparity between the dynamic and ESL drivers, there will always be a difference in the sonic signature between the two. I think it's acceptable, but many do not.
So IMO, they shouldn't get upset with such criticisms. But then it doesn't make for good press, and I can't disagree with that.
They obviously all need to get together for a beer and make friends...
Also, however much ML may like to disagree, there will always be an issue with mating dynamic drivers with ESLs. And ML know it - which is why the CLS and CLX exist.
No matter how much they try to reduce the disparity between the dynamic and ESL drivers, there will always be a difference in the sonic signature between the two. I think it's acceptable, but many do not.
So IMO, they shouldn't get upset with such criticisms. But then it doesn't make for good press, and I can't disagree with that.
Last edited: