So...it's been out a long time...Does Xstat work?

[FISH_MAN]

I thought the older models are bulky and hard to integrate into most peoples system. the newer ones look much more space age and a more stream in design . I also have the say that some of the black composites that the older speakers used and woods seem to be a little bulky and cheap looking. I like the fact that practically every part of the new xstat sytle speaker is used to make sound !

 

[MotorToad]

... Are the $10,000 Summits better than the $2,800 Sequels? Yes they are, but are they $7,200 better? It depends on your tastes and pocket book.

Please forgive any spelling errors, I am on my 3rd Victory Imperial Stout. This beer was rated a perfect 100 by Beer Advocate and I have to agree this is one great beer.

NOTHING is better than the Sequels!


(This unbiased and scientifically proven fact is brought to you by the Sequel Division of the MartinLogan Owners Club) :bowdown:

 

[Rich]

I think the x-stat panels have merely allowed ML to get the same sound out of a smaller, more WAF-friendly panel. It is a more efficient transducer, and thus can be made smaller without losing that great ML sound. Combined with the other improvements in crossover technology and woofer design, I think that it brings the overall quality level of the new generation ML's up a notch from the old line. If you compare the Summit to its predecessor, the Prodigy, you find that the Summit puts out the same level of sound in a lot smaller, more efficient package, and it is overall more neutrally-balanced (the prodigy noticeably accentuates the mid-bass).

 

[FISH_MAN]

NOTHING is better than the Sequels!


I think not !