sleepysurf
Well-known member
More Audyssey revelations! I've been playing around with the Denon/Audyssey, still learning how to use it's myriad functions. As mentioned above, I felt the Modwright tube pre still sounded more "musical" than the Denon, and indeed, even when running the Denon in "Pure Direct" mode, feeding my amp (bypassing the Modwright HTBP), there was something missing. However, in that same configuration, with the Audyssey MultiEQ invoked... WOW!! The soundstage and imaging are now pinpoint focused, with much tighter bass vs. the Modwright, yet, the overall tonal balance still retains some sense of "tube-like" vocals. An audiophile friend stopped by to borrow my Benchmark DAC, and had a (brief) listen. He thought the Denon/Audyssey revealed more "layers" in the music, and he preferred it over the Modwright! It's clear the Audyssey's "time domain" corrections, in addition to it's low frequency EQ, have a substantial effect on overall fidelity. Now, I need to find out if the Denon can have source-specific EQ settings, so I can have one for two-channel stereo mode, and another for 5.1 surround sound. To be fair, it's well accepted that the addition of tubes into the audio chain, yields both beneficial (warmer "organic" sound, midrange bloom, etc.) at the cost (sometimes) of diminished bass clarity and slightly rolled off highs. I'm going to push the Denon/Audyssey to it's limit, and see if these initial impressions hold up, and drive me back to a total solid-state rig. I'm curious to hear what other folks with an Audyssey enabled receiver think about using it as a pre/pro.