User211
Well-known member
I've had my share of issues with Vantages and now Summits.
I too am very sensitive to imbalance in the sound. The last set of panels I had were "ONLY" 3db off. That's enough to destroy imaging to my ears. Only one panel was then replaced, even though they are supposed to be "matched pairs". I have been VERY PATIENT as I do love the sound when it works. I haven't given up yet, and am working with a couple people at ML to get things resolved.
OK I don't want to drop a lemon here... but I have ALWAYS noticed a difference in sound output from each channel in all the MLs I have owned - even when panels have just been replaced. The fact of the matter, I believe, is that is very difficult to make both panels behave in an utterly consistent manner. Why this is so is probably because it is hard to get accurately matched & maintained tensioning over time, possibly crossover component tolerances and totally even distribution of whatever they spray onto the mylar (it is even visible that this is NOT consistent on a lot of ML panels I have seen).
I notice Roger Sanders ESL cookbook provides a design with a BUILT-IN panel tensioning mechanism. Trouble is this is elaborate to construct and I doubt we'll ever see it in an ML.
While the Ascent panels I have at the moment are the BEST I have ever owned, there is definately a difference in the audio output of each. This takes the form of "the left panel is definately marginally better at reproducing that frequency" and vice versa.
They are ESLs - we love 'em so we live with them - but like anything else - THEY ARE NOT FLAWLESS!!!
Last edited: