Since we haven't had enough of this topic......
... So, where does this go? What is the end result here? Is it - 'we had a problem.... the election is not valid...'....or is it... 'Look Hillary won Wisconsin and Michigan by 15 votes if we ignore these dangling chads!!'.... is it - 'we haven't had enough time to count everything - delay the inauguration ?' ....
This whole thing just seems to be a mess.... brought on by the 'Green Party'..and now happily supported by the Democratic party.... Now I know why they are 'green' .. someone is paying them!!! LOL... But, seriously, this is everything that the Democrats claimed they did not want to happen when they won.... uh....... So.... every way I look at this - the result is ugly.... Trump has said essentially - that if we didn't count the illegals that voted - he would have won the popular vote .... But, whatever..... You could go on and on with this.... And if you think there were riots right after the election... well hold on to your hats if this is somehow overturned - given to Hillary - while Trump picks his cabinet.... Talk about 'bullying the democratic process'.... My god... really? The Russians did it!!?? Really??
The thing I do not like about a re-count is that everyone knows the results... and everyone can then try to 'bias' the recount for whomever they prefer.... Without knowing the results - I feel there is less likelihood of someone tampering....
Our system is what it is..... This concept of someone hacking the devices that count the votes is pretty lame to me.... A false premise with absolutely no foundation... but lets push forward anyway to see if we can get the results we want.... By the way- -only in the rust belt states that trump won..... And in each state btw - where her strong counties threw their votes on the pile last.... while voting results were being made public.... Lets suppose something was 'hacked' like someone is implying without any grounds.... Then the entire election should be questioned... How can you prove California wasn't hacked? How can you say NY wasn't hacked? Vote count?? The result certainly can't be the litmus test right? A hack can do anything... I'm not saying anything inappropriate was done.... I think that would be aggregious ... but... to limit to 3 states when you are implying a 'hack'.... that just doesn't compute to this computer scientist.
All I am really saying here is - I just don't see a good... solid... happy result to all of this.... Just more revolution in the streets... and that is just stupid.
This whole thing just seems to be a mess.... brought on by the 'Green Party'..and now happily supported by the Democratic party.... Now I know why they are 'green' .. someone is paying them!!! LOL... But, seriously, this is everything that the Democrats claimed they did not want to happen when they won.... uh....... So.... every way I look at this - the result is ugly.... Trump has said essentially - that if we didn't count the illegals that voted - he would have won the popular vote .... But, whatever..... You could go on and on with this.... And if you think there were riots right after the election... well hold on to your hats if this is somehow overturned - given to Hillary - while Trump picks his cabinet.... Talk about 'bullying the democratic process'.... My god... really? The Russians did it!!?? Really??
The thing I do not like about a re-count is that everyone knows the results... and everyone can then try to 'bias' the recount for whomever they prefer.... Without knowing the results - I feel there is less likelihood of someone tampering....
Our system is what it is..... This concept of someone hacking the devices that count the votes is pretty lame to me.... A false premise with absolutely no foundation... but lets push forward anyway to see if we can get the results we want.... By the way- -only in the rust belt states that trump won..... And in each state btw - where her strong counties threw their votes on the pile last.... while voting results were being made public.... Lets suppose something was 'hacked' like someone is implying without any grounds.... Then the entire election should be questioned... How can you prove California wasn't hacked? How can you say NY wasn't hacked? Vote count?? The result certainly can't be the litmus test right? A hack can do anything... I'm not saying anything inappropriate was done.... I think that would be aggregious ... but... to limit to 3 states when you are implying a 'hack'.... that just doesn't compute to this computer scientist.
All I am really saying here is - I just don't see a good... solid... happy result to all of this.... Just more revolution in the streets... and that is just stupid.