Fair enough point! I have listened to various Quads and Soundlabs panels over the last few years. I don't have the models to hand. However I just found that neither had all the benefits of the ML's. The Quads had a nice midrange but were no where as near as dynamic, low end not as good and depth of image less than the CLX's. Note I do use subs re bass depth.
I just found that the CLX's had the best of all the other panels I listened too. Midrange, depth, analytical, realism, imaging, size of image and the general air around them just bettered the alternatives.
Now this is my personal opinion and with my equipment (all Arc) so you would still have to try with your equipment and in your room.
It is worth adding that I tried Wilson and Sonus Faber but my preference is the panel. I just think for realism it can't be beaten.
I understand the concerns regarding panel replacement however if they last. 10-15 years would that still be an issue? All high end hobbies will incur costs associated to it. If you buy a Porsche or Ferrari you will have to expect to invest money after some time. That is just the fact of getting involved at the top end of a specific field.
Anyway back to the subject, the CLX'S are exceptional speakers and if you like panels IMO would be very hard to be bettered (especially with a pair of Descent I's).
Hope that puts a little more perspective around my comments!
Rgds
Marc
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2