Audiophiliac
Well-known member
There is a place and time for having separate inputs for each video source. Mainly so you can calibrate the display for each. But these days, most high end displays give you multiple memory functions to accomplish this. Also, some Onkyo and Integra processors have all the ISF calibration tools built in so you can do it in the processor.
I wish they put dual HDMI outputs on mid to high level bluray players so you could send video straight up, and audio to the processor. I guess you could use splitters, but there is also something to be said about having the least amount of "stuff" in the chain...for both audio and video. Surely, every box or cable you add will have an effect. Good or bad is the question.
I think that the biggest reasons to upgrade to a newer processor is to gain room correction and better audio or video processing. HDMI is nice in some cases, but I have seen bluray at 720p/1080i via component video on a display that was not 1080P and it still looked 10x better than standard DVD. You can get the HD audio via analog inputs/outputs. Nothing broadcast on cable, DirecTV, or Dish Network is any higher than 1080i (maybe some VOD stuff is in 1080P yet?).
The benefits of HDMI are not quite enough IMHO to start replacing expensive pieces of gear that otherwise still function properly and satisfactory. It sure can clean up a rats nest of wires though. Some people like that. But you really need to have every device in your system HDMI. Makes a clean install.
When HDMI 1.4 rolls out and if it does what they are claiming it will, that will be the time to jump on the wagon. So if you can hold out a few years, it might be worth it.
I wish they put dual HDMI outputs on mid to high level bluray players so you could send video straight up, and audio to the processor. I guess you could use splitters, but there is also something to be said about having the least amount of "stuff" in the chain...for both audio and video. Surely, every box or cable you add will have an effect. Good or bad is the question.
I think that the biggest reasons to upgrade to a newer processor is to gain room correction and better audio or video processing. HDMI is nice in some cases, but I have seen bluray at 720p/1080i via component video on a display that was not 1080P and it still looked 10x better than standard DVD. You can get the HD audio via analog inputs/outputs. Nothing broadcast on cable, DirecTV, or Dish Network is any higher than 1080i (maybe some VOD stuff is in 1080P yet?).
The benefits of HDMI are not quite enough IMHO to start replacing expensive pieces of gear that otherwise still function properly and satisfactory. It sure can clean up a rats nest of wires though. Some people like that. But you really need to have every device in your system HDMI. Makes a clean install.
When HDMI 1.4 rolls out and if it does what they are claiming it will, that will be the time to jump on the wagon. So if you can hold out a few years, it might be worth it.