If you could truly bipass the interernal amp that would be a great option to have. I can't see why an audiophile who has a high quality amp would want to use an amplified speaker, chances are the stand alone amp they have will blow away the built in amp.
Which way to go?
- Thread starter wartman
- Start date
Help Support MartinLogan Audio Owners Forum:
amey01
Well-known member
Not if the amps come after the crossover - ie. truly active. That has real benefits!
I don't own the Purity. I based my comments on 'bypassing' the internal amplifier based on a couple of reviews such as this link:
http://hometheaterreview.com/martinlogan-purity-hybrid-electrostatic-loudspeaker-reviewed/
On re-reading the review and a couple of others, it's still unclear, but there are suggestions that an audiophile power amplifier may produce 'better' results - go figure. It would seem, however, that it is true that the internal power amplifier is NOT bypassed (?)
Regardless. I stand by my comments about the merits of the Purity. It is an outstanding speaker. The panel seems more open and coherent, and the bass is fast and deep. I would suggest that Purity is showing the way of future ML products in the lower to mid price band. :cheers:
P.S. What ML should do is during the next Purity upgrade, is include balanced/XLR inputs. I run a fully balanced system, and the Purity would have more appeal to the true audiophile if it was so equipped.
http://hometheaterreview.com/martinlogan-purity-hybrid-electrostatic-loudspeaker-reviewed/
On re-reading the review and a couple of others, it's still unclear, but there are suggestions that an audiophile power amplifier may produce 'better' results - go figure. It would seem, however, that it is true that the internal power amplifier is NOT bypassed (?)
Regardless. I stand by my comments about the merits of the Purity. It is an outstanding speaker. The panel seems more open and coherent, and the bass is fast and deep. I would suggest that Purity is showing the way of future ML products in the lower to mid price band. :cheers:
P.S. What ML should do is during the next Purity upgrade, is include balanced/XLR inputs. I run a fully balanced system, and the Purity would have more appeal to the true audiophile if it was so equipped.
Last edited:
amey01
Well-known member
Mmmmmmmm - well, sub-editing doesn't seem to exist these days. There are far too many reviewers that just say what sounds right without actually listening or researching.
A good sub-editor should be picking up holes in the text, ambiguities, things that contradict, etc. Nothing should be unclear as you say.
It's so easy for anyone halfway educated to see through, but that's the way it seems to be these days.
This is a general comment and not a comment directed at the linked review or anything else.
If you do want a specific example, just look at the Australian Hi-Fi July'09 and September'09 reviews of different Sonique loudspeakers by different reviewers.....what a joke!
Last edited:
Here's another review from The Perfect Vision. This reviewer suggests the internal amplifier only drives the Purity's bass unit when using an external power amplifier... 
http://www.avguide.com/review/the-martinlogan-purity-hybrid-electrostatic-loudspeaker
http://www.avguide.com/review/the-martinlogan-purity-hybrid-electrostatic-loudspeaker
robertawillisjr
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2005
- Messages
- 556
- Reaction score
- 0
Perhaps I missed something, but did anyone talked to ML.
