I just posted the following in the $3000 and up digital projector section of AVS forum under the Sony VPL-VW200 thread.
Okay for what it is worth, which is not that much
I have a 120 inch HP 2.8 screen, with the Sony 90ES set exactly dead center to the HP screen at 19 feet 5 inches. I have both Sony glasses and Xpand glasses.
As I think I previously reported, I watched Alice in Wonderland and was pretty impressed. Out of the box it seemed a little darker but that is in comparison to 2D which is noticeably brighter. So after a couple minutes I was fine with brightness. The main thing that I was worried about was ghosting. That is what was the determining factor when I bought my Panny VT25. I had my own source material, which was still images and videos captured on a Fuji W3. I went around to several different places and tried viewing my material on each TV and I had a few still photos that had logos or text in the background that showed ghosting on every TV I tried. Obviously the Panny was the best IMO and showed the least amount of ghosting, but there still was some there. I decided to live with it and bought the Panny.
Now in this thread I have been reading about major ghosting on the Sony and then a couple posts later that ghosting was non-existant. This made me nervous as I waited for my 90ES to arrive and since I kept my VW200 I was worried about 2D PQ as well.
Okay, so I watched A Christmas Carol, and frankly it was an experience that I have difficulty in describing. First, again no ghosting, not a little, not some here but not there, NONE, nada. And the scene in the beginning where it is snowing. Well my wife was blown away and so was I. My wife is an unbelieveable critic, she doesn't like my sports car collection, she doesn't like my motorcycle collection, she doesn't like my hi-end audiophile system, SACD, DVD Audio, projectors, I could go on and on. Nothing has made a postive impression on her, until A Christmas Carol in 3D. It was snowing in my HT and I don't mean it looked like snow, it was snowing and you could hear the flakes landing all around you and some of the flakes were landing on your nose. This was the best 3D effect that I have seen so far.
Now I got to thinking, hmmm no ghosting, why not bring up the Fuji W3 images that have ghosted on everything I have ever tested them on and see what happens with them. I plugged in the Fuji and was startled to see no ghosting, not a little, not minimal, none, nada. The one photograph that even ghosts a little bit on the Panny, nothing on the Sony, just clear crisp image.
The video of a dozen hummingbirds feeding on a 6 slot feeder, again no ghosting and the feeder and hummingbirds are hanging out in to the middle of the room, you can reach out with your hand and grab them. Phenomenal 3D effect with No Ghosting!
So why am I posting this? Well after reading this thread and seeing the totally different performance that people are getting from their new 90ES, it makes me think there is something else afoot here.
I like many others thought the Panny was the best 3DTV with very minimal ghosting. And some material on the Panny has no ghosting at all. But if I can take something that does ghost on the Panny and take to the Sony and it has absolutely no ghosting, then something in the chain or the chain itself must be causing the ghosting. Otherwise how could some people see so much that they return the new Sony and others see little to no ghosting and yes, I see none, zip, nada, no ghosting at all?
Now I do admit that I must have got a good 90ES, because it seems to have perfect alignment, it was really good out of the box and I have tweaked the picture with the help of settings posted here and it even matches up well against the VW200 in 2D.
Anyway, don't know what to tell you, because there seem to be quite a few variables at work here, but something is afoot, for why else would you have such contrasting results?
And that as they say is the real story here
So bottom line because of the chain YMMV.