Nucleafueled
Member
Hello Friends,
The pedigree of my Aerius-i's is uncertain. The seller had the classic nonsense saga; that they had been in storage for X years etc... I drove 225 miles to acquire them. Only in the late stages of inspecting them did I notice one of the dustcaps on one of the woofers was Concave (#8271B) while the other was Convex (#8271C)...? The seller shrugged it off as no big deal. Most buyers probably would have headed for the door but I was too tired from the road, and this was THE DREAM after all -"I'll figure it out later, they're Martin Logans!" I told myself. When I got them home and isolated just the woofers for listening, it was immediately clear that one woofer was brighter and punchy, the other a bit lower and muddy. Dream going great so far! lol. I wrote to the seller, so far, you guessed it, not a word back.
Okay, so what do I think of them? Ummm, can I say this here? Disappointed. After years of bright and crisp B&W's I found the ML Aerius-i's to be flat and lifeless with no dynamic punch or clarity. They sound like my other speaker sets would sound if 2 or 3 large comforters were thrown over them. The amp is a Crown XLS-10000, running straight from an Onkyo SACD player with some modest Audioquest cables.
Years ago I was a fanatic for tweaks and cables, footers, and all manner of money draining stuff. I can't and won't do that anymore. I only submit to decent cables and that's it. Are these ML speakers just an acquired taste? Are ML Electrostatics a love/hate item like the Bose 901's?
My room is a concrete Art Studio, 18'x40', see pic. My favorite speakers for the space have been a pair of huge Cerwin Vega E-715's that I have. They are Giants that pump out copious amounts of crisp, neck snapping, highly energized sound. I put the Aerius-i's in their footprint and just about cried when I heard a little whisper (whimper perhaps) of muffled sound slowly rolling out of the Aerius-i panels. They sounded half asleep and in no rush to follow the bits and bytes of the CD that was instructing them. Wow, and ugghh. No, I didn't expect the Aerius-i's to match the sheer brute of the CV's but, geez.... so tiny a sound from these Aerius-i...?
I like to take things apart so naturally I had them broken down in 20 minutes, had the Stator panel free and washed in my work sink. A couple of hours later I had them back in service. The cleaning may have improved the sound somewhat but the above description still applies. I wrote to ML support with my thoughts and they suggested I audition some NEW ML offerings; a true salesman! Yes, I have no doubt that a fresh pair of Ethos would be a big improvement.
Any thoughts appreciated.
Nuc-
Note* My connection was not suitable for image uploads at this time,
The pedigree of my Aerius-i's is uncertain. The seller had the classic nonsense saga; that they had been in storage for X years etc... I drove 225 miles to acquire them. Only in the late stages of inspecting them did I notice one of the dustcaps on one of the woofers was Concave (#8271B) while the other was Convex (#8271C)...? The seller shrugged it off as no big deal. Most buyers probably would have headed for the door but I was too tired from the road, and this was THE DREAM after all -"I'll figure it out later, they're Martin Logans!" I told myself. When I got them home and isolated just the woofers for listening, it was immediately clear that one woofer was brighter and punchy, the other a bit lower and muddy. Dream going great so far! lol. I wrote to the seller, so far, you guessed it, not a word back.
Okay, so what do I think of them? Ummm, can I say this here? Disappointed. After years of bright and crisp B&W's I found the ML Aerius-i's to be flat and lifeless with no dynamic punch or clarity. They sound like my other speaker sets would sound if 2 or 3 large comforters were thrown over them. The amp is a Crown XLS-10000, running straight from an Onkyo SACD player with some modest Audioquest cables.
Years ago I was a fanatic for tweaks and cables, footers, and all manner of money draining stuff. I can't and won't do that anymore. I only submit to decent cables and that's it. Are these ML speakers just an acquired taste? Are ML Electrostatics a love/hate item like the Bose 901's?
My room is a concrete Art Studio, 18'x40', see pic. My favorite speakers for the space have been a pair of huge Cerwin Vega E-715's that I have. They are Giants that pump out copious amounts of crisp, neck snapping, highly energized sound. I put the Aerius-i's in their footprint and just about cried when I heard a little whisper (whimper perhaps) of muffled sound slowly rolling out of the Aerius-i panels. They sounded half asleep and in no rush to follow the bits and bytes of the CD that was instructing them. Wow, and ugghh. No, I didn't expect the Aerius-i's to match the sheer brute of the CV's but, geez.... so tiny a sound from these Aerius-i...?
I like to take things apart so naturally I had them broken down in 20 minutes, had the Stator panel free and washed in my work sink. A couple of hours later I had them back in service. The cleaning may have improved the sound somewhat but the above description still applies. I wrote to ML support with my thoughts and they suggested I audition some NEW ML offerings; a true salesman! Yes, I have no doubt that a fresh pair of Ethos would be a big improvement.
Any thoughts appreciated.
Nuc-
Note* My connection was not suitable for image uploads at this time,