dsrtjeeper
Member
Now, for the rest of it.
That room is definitely an echo chamber as I see it. Lot's of broad, unbroken surfaces behind, and to the sides of the speakers will transfer a lot of reflected energy back into the room.
Smooth, reflective opposing walls set up a nice resonance vector for mids and highs.
So no surprise you are unhappy with the sound, and hear too much of a reverberant field.
With dipole, line source electrostats, one has basically the acoustic equivalent of a 3' or 4' high stack of dynamic-driver mini-monitors, two-deep, one facing forward, and one facing the wall (and out of phase).
There's a reason we don't see too many people running dynamic drivers like this, it introduces huge placement complexities.
The biggest is the energy being directed at the wall behind the speaker.
As I usually suggest, managing and dampening that is job #1. I recommend one RealTraps MiniTrap HF behind each of your speakers offset from the wall by 2" and aligned on the wall to be at the focal point of the rear of the panel.
Thank you very much. The room actually doesn't echo like you'd think. I only get a slight PA sound from certain HD programming through satellite tv.
On the subject of absorption behind the speakers; what do you mean by "focal point?" Also; why space the absorbing panels 2" from the wall? Is this more effective at absorbing high frequencies? I currently am playing with 12" x 5' Echo Buster absorbing panels behind the speakers. I'm not hearing a big difference so far. Maybe a bit more depth to the stage and more central focus. Vocals are still thin sounding until I sit to the side of the speakers. In essence; the sweet spot is very small and sounds thin. Bass is starting to sound better and the lower registers seem very accurate and non-bloated. Vocals are annoyingly recessed and not fleshed out as much as I'd like.
Thanks and keep the great replies coming.
Eric