SteveInNC
Well-known member
I've been posting here off and on for awhile now. I've also auditioned Ascents several times over the past two years... and I "finally gone and done it", and wrote the check last Friday. Hopefully, they should arrive this week.
I tend to keep audio gear. The Ascents are replacing a pair of ESS AMT-1Cs bought new from circa 1981. It took that long for me to find something that I considered a good enough step up for the money that it would require. In inflation-adjusted dollars, the Ascents will cost about what the AMTs did in 1981 dollars. The current speaker technology is obviously better than that of 1981.
I guess it's a geek thing, but I've always seemed to be drawn by unconventional speaker designs. Over the years I've come close to buying KEF monitors, Acoustat 2+2s, Magneplanar, and Vandersteens. The MLs seem to pull everything together as a whole.
While the ESS have better bass than the Ascents and higher-frequency highs (some would say "harsh") due to the Heil AMT, the Ascents kill on the mid-range and vocals where it so happens most of my musical taste now lies, and perform admirably in the lows and (human hearing) highs. Shaking the walls gets old when you get old .
I auditioned the Ascents without and with a Depth sub. The sub definitely "fixes" the perceived bass issue, but the extra $1700 was a bit out of reach when combined with my current tuition payments (working on an MBA). Once I get used to the Ascents and have broken them in sufficiently, I'll revisit the need for bass augmentation.
We'll see where new electronics figure into abusing my bank account too.
I tend to keep audio gear. The Ascents are replacing a pair of ESS AMT-1Cs bought new from circa 1981. It took that long for me to find something that I considered a good enough step up for the money that it would require. In inflation-adjusted dollars, the Ascents will cost about what the AMTs did in 1981 dollars. The current speaker technology is obviously better than that of 1981.
I guess it's a geek thing, but I've always seemed to be drawn by unconventional speaker designs. Over the years I've come close to buying KEF monitors, Acoustat 2+2s, Magneplanar, and Vandersteens. The MLs seem to pull everything together as a whole.
While the ESS have better bass than the Ascents and higher-frequency highs (some would say "harsh") due to the Heil AMT, the Ascents kill on the mid-range and vocals where it so happens most of my musical taste now lies, and perform admirably in the lows and (human hearing) highs. Shaking the walls gets old when you get old .
I auditioned the Ascents without and with a Depth sub. The sub definitely "fixes" the perceived bass issue, but the extra $1700 was a bit out of reach when combined with my current tuition payments (working on an MBA). Once I get used to the Ascents and have broken them in sufficiently, I'll revisit the need for bass augmentation.
We'll see where new electronics figure into abusing my bank account too.