Search results

The sides are not covered but have to try hard to see inside. ( I'm looking at mine while I 'm writing this.)

I've installed logan passage inwall ( for surround) last week. They really sound great.

I eamil Martin Logan about this. They sent me a pdf file where they say that they used 2,8 cubic feet ( 14.5 x 3.5 x 96 in) the typical volume between 2 studs in modern American houses. So I will have to check that it doesn't go too far from this 2,8 cubic feet target and make the ajustment needed.

No, the manual only say how to put it on a wall, how to cut it, but nowhere are they talking about volume. In a standard ( new) house, the space between two stud is usually the same. However, I live in an old house. If I open a wall there there can be lots of space or no space at all.

Nobody knows

The title say it all. I would like to built a box behind the wall for my soon to be there passage. What is the optimum volume needed for martin logan passage.

I will look for a sub ( the passage or it's replacement will have to wait for a few months). The depth ( i or not) is very tempting and I think it would be a visually great match with my vantage. The descent is also on my wish list ( but not has WAF friendly as the depth). There are also the...

Not sure what to do. There is an annoying discontinuity between my front Vantage and my surround speakers. My diy surround speakers ( 4" seas and planar tweeters) can't reproduce any bass. Replace my diy inwall surround speakers with Passage. or Add a sub to handle the surround speakers bass...

Maybe those guinea pigs simply chose the sound that they were used to.

Pâradigm. Signature sub 1: Signature sub 2: I've seen something similar elsewhere.

True! They come in pair.;)

They look like Vantages on steroid.

In fact the word that I should have used is not balcony, but mezzanine. It's part of the house structure. Maybe next year I will buy a sub. Size doesn't matter. It would be nice if martin logan implement their wireless subwoofing for the decent and depth. Maybe we'll see descentii and depth...

When someone ask about subwoofer placement it is usually suggested to move the sub around the listening room until it sound great ( Ok, in some case good), or to put the sub at the listening position and to crawl on the floor. My point is that last part on the floor. What about trying...

The owner still doesn't know how to use a remote so he keeps buying tv sets.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj6QqCH7g0Q

You didn'use the right stategy. First you show her what you "would like" for your birthday. something like: You'd like it, but it's way too expensive. There is also: But since you're a raisonnable man, you would settle for something more in par with your finance: :devil:

Could you sue the previous owner for Hidden Defects? With the money you could buy something good.:music:

What I would like to see is some indoor measurements. ( But the best that I could find were those outdoor measurements. I did few years ago experiment comparing outdoor and indoor performance. My Dynaudio had plenty of bass inside but were bass shy outside. The fact is that the closer one place...

From, avtalk sub tests: Which sub would be able to sustain 105 db? (result for 20 and 25 hz) Depth? No. Not even close (88db/94db) Paradigm Servo 15? No (93db/100db) Rel Stadium? No (90db/95db) Sunfire: True Subwoofer EQ? No(--/95db) Svs: Pb12-nsd? No, but we're getting closer. (99db/100db)...