You can easily see the effects of ARC; in fact, with ARC applied, this is one of the flattest spatially averaged in-room responses I have measured in 27 years of performing this test. Yes, this excellent behavior was partly due to JI's superbly proportioned room—but if you disregard the narrow peak just above 100Hz and the slight lack of energy between 150 and 250Hz, the response falls within ±2dB limits from 20Hz to 10kHz. Wow! (What I haven't shown is how closely the left and right speakers matched at the listening position: within 1dB from 100Hz to 20kHz!)
ARC is cheating though. It’s only and whole purpose is to smooth in room frequency response!Dipole electrostatic speakers typically measure poorly, vs. point source designs, in Harman's "Spinarama" measurements, which Floyd Toole championed. However, those of us who own them, feel their overall musicality and detail far outweighs their poorer off-axis measurements.
Here's an excerpt from John Atkinson's measurements and comments in the S'Phile review of the ML Renaissance 15A, noting the superb frequency response (with ARC enabled) for their newest hybrid models... MartinLogan Masterpiece Renaissance ESL 15A loudspeaker Measurements
Yes!Hybrid electrostats have their own set of problems. We all take our preferred speakers with their own special issues. Nothing is perfect. Sad but true!
. . . up to 300Hz.ARC is cheating though. It’s only and whole purpose is to smooth in room frequency response!
The whole presentation is worth watching, but at 1:03:40 he throws a direct dig at a Martin Logan speaker.
What model could he be alluding at?
And essential in most rooms!. . . up to 300Hz.
ARC is cheating though. It’s only and whole purpose is to smooth in room frequency response!
I think it was just yesterday that I received an audio/video print catalog and one of their 'experts' was talking up the benefits (and IIRC, 'resurgence') of two channel audio (sorry, it went out with the recycle bin so I can't quote it). While I love my two channel rig and continue to invest in it... I do think you are 100% correct...Two channel systems are going to go the way of the Model T Ford. Science and technology is passing them by. That's a good thing though. Science moves things forward.
That's the kind of cheating that we all need! The future is clearly heading to powered speakers. I'd say in 15 years they will be a large part of the market. Two channel systems are going to go the way of the Model T Ford. Science and technology is passing them by. That's a good thing though. Science moves things forward.
Measuring frequency response is one thing, dynamics is another.
You need to come hear my rig then. Dynamics out the wazoo here.While my ML's can play with authority and much louder than I need, I don't think many people consider them a very dynamic speaker.
Quite sure it was the Sumit.What model could he be alluding at?
This is one reason why Klipsch are always seem to get the nod for sounding LIVE. 98 - 99 dBA for some of them at one watt allows them to react with a lot of impact. The PA like horn design may add to the live sound as well. I've heard the imaging isn't the greatest for their horn speakers, but that is total hearsay. I think I listened to a pair 35 years ago and I don't remember anything about the pair I heard.
While my ML's can play with authority and much louder than I need, I don't think many people consider them a very dynamic speaker.
You need to come hear my rig then. Dynamics out the wazoo here.
But there is nothing stock in my system, and those MBM units are a huuuuge part of the dynamics story.
It's all about system and room acoustics balance. ESL just makes that much harder to achieve, but the rewards are worth it.
Enter your email address to join: