I would like to ask a few questions about these 2 models.
I noticed Sterophile said the original Depth sub never really blended into the room and you could always tell from what area of the room the bass was coming from. Is this true? Did the new Depth i take care of that , if it was a problem.
From what I read , it looks like the Descent blends better , is that correct ? and if so would it be too much for a room 12x20?. I assume the smaller depth sub would be better suited to the room since it isn't super huge.
Have any of you put a ML sub between your speakers to even out the bass? or somewhat down the side wall between the listening position and the speaker. I assume you would loose a little bass response with the sub between the speakers and not in the corner.
As noted , my main concern is, can I get by with a depth or depth i and not have to be concerned about it drawing attention to itself or would the extra money for the descent be worth it and be suitable for my room.
Thanks, Greg
I noticed Sterophile said the original Depth sub never really blended into the room and you could always tell from what area of the room the bass was coming from. Is this true? Did the new Depth i take care of that , if it was a problem.
From what I read , it looks like the Descent blends better , is that correct ? and if so would it be too much for a room 12x20?. I assume the smaller depth sub would be better suited to the room since it isn't super huge.
Have any of you put a ML sub between your speakers to even out the bass? or somewhat down the side wall between the listening position and the speaker. I assume you would loose a little bass response with the sub between the speakers and not in the corner.
As noted , my main concern is, can I get by with a depth or depth i and not have to be concerned about it drawing attention to itself or would the extra money for the descent be worth it and be suitable for my room.
Thanks, Greg